The 4 Levels Of Hybrid Experiences

6 minute read
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on email
  • Smart experience stagers have long created hybrid experiences – real world experiences amplified by digital
  • With Covid-19 removing the real world element, experience stagers are now focusing more on the digital / amplification
  • Joe Pine believes that a new 4-level model will emerge for hybrid experiences

As Jim Gilmore and I discuss in No Experiences, No Recovery, post-COVID-19 the Experience Economy not only must come back for economic recovery, it will come back. But in many situations it will be different.

I’ve already written about what companies should be doing differently to confront the corona crisis in this Thoughts post, and here I would like to amplify on one particular aspect that will be different, and that is, appropriately enough, experience amplification through hybrid experiences.

Experience Amplification Through Hybrid Experiences

Experience stagers have long amplified their experiences through social media, in particular with “pop-up” marketing experiences that engage a relatively few number of people physically, but then are filmed, edited, and put on social media to capture the attention of thousands, hundreds of thousands, even millions of potential customers.

Just one favorite example to illustrate the point: Marriott’s Teleporter (which as of this writing has over 290,000 views).

After you’ve watched the video, and then Google those two words and see how much more media sites and news stations further amplified this one-day physical experience into millions of media hits. Here’s one great example:

Now, as companies respond to the lack of people coming to physical venues, more and more of them have turned to digital events. But that alone is a poor substitute – and I am not talking about the virtual experience (which can be very poor, but also can be very good – it just depends on how well they embrace the principles of experience staging). Rather, it’s a poor business substitute as it has yet to prove capable of generating the same level of revenue.

Virtual experience is a poor business substitute – as it has yet to prove capable of generating the same level of revenue.
Jim Gilmore & Joe Pine

The right approach, one that many companies are already employing, is to stage hybrid experiences that amplify the live experience virtually.
This approach doesn’t work everywhere, but can be especially effective for business conferences or huge consumer experiences such as sporting events, festivals, concerts, and other types of large gatherings.

The hybrid experience model I see coming involves four levels:

This image is by another WXO Co-Founder, Kevin Dulle.

Level 1: The Live Experience

First, stage the live experience for however many people are allowed to attend and desire to do so.

These guests can be charged 100% of the standard admission fee, and perhaps even more if capacity is limited, as standard economic principles apply: the lower the supply, the higher the price (as long as sufficient demand exists).

Note, too, how whenever any type of experience (bars, restaurants, theme parks, sporting events, and so forth) opens up to whatever capacity the government allows, that capacity is pretty much reached immediately and persists. (The lone exception: movie theaters.)

Level 2: The Digital Simulcast + Social Experience

Second, simultaneously offer the experience digitally to those who want the live experience but cannot or are unwilling to attend it physically.

This same-time, different-place simulcast of the live experience can amplify it to many, many more people – potentially one or more orders of magnitude than could be there physically. These digital attendees can be charged some portion of the physical admission fee, potentially more than recouping the lost physical revenue.

Sporting events have long broadcasted live events to millions of spectators, and now do so on apps as well (where at least the MLB app charges for the virtual experience). While perhaps only pay-per-view boxing approaches anywhere near a significant portion of the admission fee of the live event, most all sports leagues make more money from simulcasting than from physical spectators.

eSports and Twitchification

But there’s one genre of sports that goes a step further, one that every other hybrid experience stager can learn from it: eSports.

The key element that enables watching people play videogames to actually be an amazingly engaging experience is the social media interactions that Twitch pioneered. (Visit this page to check out some live Twitch channels focused on esports.)

A still from a Twitch watch party.

Few people watch the game action unaided; they tune in to one or more channels, where commentators put their own spin on the action and add in their own comments via chat or video. They thus shift from being mere spectators to full-on participants, enhancing the experience themselves for others.

How can you likewise embrace “Twitchification” in your live but virtual simulcast? (Twitchification? See ESPN touts ‘Twitch-ification’ of NBA streaming.) Done well, these participants actually have a more engaging – and therefore more valuable – experience than those that are there in person.

For example, when keynoting at The Presence Summit this past July – a great event itself for learning how to take physical events virtual – I participated in “backchannel” rooms where people could talk to each other about what they were learning in the main event.

One gentleman I talked to said he was spending all his time in the backchannel, conversing with speakers like me and others who really engaged in the subject matter. He said he’d watch the videos later to get the content so as not to miss the conversations he could only get right there, right then!

Level 3: The Post Event Asynchronous Experience

Which in fact leads right into the third level in this hybrid experiences model: take all of your sessions of the experience (however you might define them) and offer them for sale on an asynchronous basis, after the event.

These ‘different-time, different-place’ viewers can absorb the bite-sized chunks you offer online whenever and wherever they desire – except in real-time, that is. That’s reserved for those who pay the higher fees for the live performance, whether in reality or virtuality.

But you could perhaps have another order of magnitude of people who would pay significantly less but collectively valuable amounts that yield yet another revenue stream.

TED, for example, created a virtual event for May-July 2020 called TED 2020: Uncharted where it offered three levels of access at three different price points:

  • $5,000 admission fee gave access to the virtual event only and Twitch-like “community interaction” during the event
  • $10,000 admission fee gave access to the virtual event, Twitch-like “community interaction” during the event, and access to the live, physical 2021 TED Conference in Monterey, CA
  • $1,000 admission fee gave access to the live stream without the “interactive or networking elements”

Level 4: The Recap

Because of TED’s global mission of offering “ideas worth spreading” it eventually puts all of its TED Talks online for anyone to view.

This is how TED talks start. Later, anyone with an internet connection gets to watch them.

Similarly, any hybrid experience stager can at least summarize the highlights of the hybrid experience, in short, free videos on YouTube and other social media sites – generally better for commercial enterprises than allowing access to the entire event – to get even more people to wish they had been there live, and through such amplification create demand for the next experience.

Done well, for many experiences I fully believe this hybrid experience model has the potential to create more revenue than pre-COVID experiences that ignored virtual possibilities.

“this hybrid experience model has the potential to create more revenue than pre-COVID experiences that ignored virtual possibilities”

About The Author

Internationally acclaimed author, speaker, and management advisor, who coined the term Experience Economy through the seminal book, The Experience Economy (now in its third edition). Since then, Joe has led the Experience Economy, and brought many people along with him. Runs management advisory firm Strategic Horizons with The Experience Economy’s co-author Jim Gilmore.

Joe originally published this think piece here on the Strategic Horizons website.

Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on email